Taylor v. Clarke
This text of 671 F. App'x 197 (Taylor v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Vincent Kyle Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing Taylor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and he has filed .motions for appointment of counsel. Taylor’s failure to challenge on appeal the district court’s dispositive holdings amounts to a waiver of appellate review of those holdings. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th C.ir. 2004). Thus, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Taylor v. Clarke, No. 1:15-cv-01188-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. June 23, 2016). We deny Taylor’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-clarke-ca4-2016.