Taylor v. Clarke

671 F. App'x 197
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2016·No. No. 16-6910·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Kyle Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing Taylor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and he has filed .motions for appointment of counsel. Taylor’s failure to challenge on appeal the district court’s dispositive holdings amounts to a waiver of appellate review of those holdings. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th C.ir. 2004). Thus, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Taylor v. Clarke, No. 1:15-cv-01188-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. June 23, 2016). We deny Taylor’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Clarke, 671 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2016).

671 F. App'x 197 (Taylor v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)