Taylor v. City of Stuart

Supreme Court of Florida

Taylor v. City of Stuart

196 So. 869, 143 Fla. 370, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1209

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 14, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted upon the transcript of the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel the Court finds no reversible error in the record and the interlocutory orders appealed from are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Buford, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Chief Justice Terrell and Justice Ti-iomas not participating* as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted upon the transcript of the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel the Court finds no reversible error in the record and the interlocutory orders appealed from are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Buford, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Chief Justice Terrell and Justice Ti-iomas not participating* as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Taylor v. City of Stuart, 196 So. 869, 143 Fla. 370, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1209 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

196 So. 869 (Taylor v. City of Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.