Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Taylor v. City Investing Co.

Taylor v. City Investing Co.

269 A.D. 1019, 59 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5068
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 1945
StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D. 1019 (Taylor v. City Investing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. City Investing Co., 269 A.D. 1019, 59 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Wasservogel and Peek, JJ.; Dore and Peck, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment appealed from and dismiss the complaint. (See Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Company, 83 N. Y. 378, 383; Newberry & Co. v. Warnecke & Co., 267 App. Div. 418, 421, affd. 293 N. Y. 698; Jordy v. Frango Corp., 291 N. Y. 781; Rafailovich v, Sudman, 293 N. Y. 668.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jordy v. Frango Corporation
53 N.E.2d 244 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Rafailovich v. Sudman
56 N.E.2d 260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Newberry Company, Inc. v. George W. Warnecke Co.
56 N.E.2d 585 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron Company
83 N.Y. 378 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)
Newberry & Co. v. George W. Warnecke & Co.
267 A.D. 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 1019, 59 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-city-investing-co-nyappdiv-1945.