Taylor v. City Investing Co.
269 A.D. 1019, 59 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5068
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1945·Published
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Wasservogel and Peek, JJ.; Dore and Peck, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment appealed from and dismiss the complaint. (See Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Company, 83 N. Y. 378, 383; Newberry & Co. v. Warnecke & Co., 267 App. Div. 418, 421, affd. 293 N. Y. 698; Jordy v. Frango Corp., 291 N. Y. 781; Rafailovich v, Sudman, 293 N. Y. 668.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. City Investing Co., 269 A.D. 1019, 59 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 1019 (Taylor v. City Investing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jordy v. Frango Corporation
53 N.E.2d 244 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Rafailovich v. Sudman
56 N.E.2d 260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Newberry Company, Inc. v. George W. Warnecke Co.
56 N.E.2d 585 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron Company
83 N.Y. 378 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)
Newberry & Co. v. George W. Warnecke & Co.
267 A.D. 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)