Taylor v. Chesterfield County

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2005·No. 04-2398·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2398

A. CORWIN TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; NATHANIEL M. COLLIER, III; WILLIAM B. CAVE; JANE K. HENSLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-686-3)

Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 10, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

A. Corwin Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

A. Corwin Taylor seeks to appeal the district court's

order remanding the civil action against him to state court for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his subsequent

motion to vacate the remand order. The district court's remand

order is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In

addition, we grant Taylor's motion for leave to file his informal

brief out of time and deny his motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Chesterfield County, (4th Cir. 2005).

Taylor v. Chesterfield County (Taylor v. Chesterfield County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related