Taylor v. Chapline

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Taylor v. Chapline

10 Ky. 491, 3 A.K. Marsh. 491, 1821 Ky. LEXIS 191

DecidedJune 7, 1821

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ky. 491 (Taylor v. Chapline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Chapline, 10 Ky. 491, 3 A.K. Marsh. 491, 1821 Ky. LEXIS 191 (Ky. Ct. App. 1821).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Mills

delivered the opinion.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered for improvements, under the occupying claimant laws. One item in the report of commissioners was objected to, but the exception rested on matters of fact, dehors the record, [492]*492The court, after hearing the evidence, overruled the ob-jeciion. No bill of exceptions was sealed, shewing what evidence was introduced — of course the presumption is that the court below decided riglit.

The judgment is therefore affirmed with damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Mills

delivered the opinion.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered for improvements, under the occupying claimant laws. One item in the report of commissioners was objected to, but the exception rested on matters of fact, dehors the record, [492]*492The court, after hearing the evidence, overruled the ob-jeciion. No bill of exceptions was sealed, shewing what evidence was introduced — of course the presumption is that the court below decided riglit.

The judgment is therefore affirmed with damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Ky. 491, 3 A.K. Marsh. 491, 1821 Ky. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-chapline-kyctapp-1821.