Taylor v. Carpenter
This text of 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 68 (Taylor v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The chancellor decided, in this case, that this court has jurisdiction to •* ¡restrain a defendant from using the trade marks of the com- ° [69]*69plainant, by which he is enabled to palm off upon the community a simulated article as the genuine article manufactured by the complainant. And that it is immaterial whether such similated article is, or is not of equal goodness and value to the genuine.
That in such a case the fact that the complainant,is the subject of a foreign government, and the defendant a citizen of the United States, will not alter the rights of the parties, or deprive the complainant of the assistance of the court, if his rights have been violated,
Injunction made perpetual, with costs to be paid by defendant; with liberty to complainants to have a reference to a master to ascertain and report the amount of their damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-carpenter-nychanctsara-1844.