Taylor v. Camel

586 So. 2d 151, 1991 La. App. LEXIS 2502, 1991 WL 185503
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 19, 1991
DocketNo. W91-949
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 586 So. 2d 151 (Taylor v. Camel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Camel, 586 So. 2d 151, 1991 La. App. LEXIS 2502, 1991 WL 185503 (La. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY:

The trial court erred in dissolving the temporary restraining order. An Individual Retirement Account is an incorporeal not evidenced by a written instrument. As such, it can be pledged in accordance with La.R.S. 9:4321-4323. In the instant case, the requirements for a valid pledge were satisfied in that a written act of pledge was executed by the parties and an account executive of Thompson McKinnon Securities, Inc. signed an acknowledgment of receipt of the act of pledge.

Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is reversed and set aside. It is ordered the temporary restraining order be reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cottonport Bank v. Roy (In Re Roy)
58 F.3d 168 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
Cottonport Bank v. Roy
58 F.3d 168 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
586 So. 2d 151, 1991 La. App. LEXIS 2502, 1991 WL 185503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-camel-lactapp-1991.