Taylor v. Calloway
This text of 14 La. Ann. 688 (Taylor v. Calloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a third opposition, in which plaintiff claims a privilege on the proceeds of the sale of a slave, over the seizing creditors. There was judgment against the third opponent, and he has appealed.
B. A. Smith, the judgment debtor, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the grounds, that neither the Shexfiff nor seizing creditors, have been made parties to the appeal. The creditor's are interested in maintaining the judgment appealed from, and are, therefore, necessary parties. There is no appeal bond in their favor, which is necessary to make them parties appellees.
It is, therefore, ordered and decreed, that the motion be sustained, and the appeal be mismissed at costs of appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 La. Ann. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-calloway-la-1859.