Taylor v. . Buckley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Taylor v. . Buckley

27 N.C. 384

DecidedJune 5, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 27 N.C. 384 (Taylor v. . Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. . Buckley, 27 N.C. 384 (N.C. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Daniel, J,

The plaintiffs are citizens of New York, and the defendant is a citizen of Texas. In the case of Broghill v. Wellborn, 4 Dev. 511, this court said, that a non-resident creditor cannot, under our attachment laws, attach the property of his debtor in this State, when the latter has not abscond ed nor removed to avoid the ordinary process of the law. It is not necessary here to repeat the reasons of the decision in that case. The case is in point and supports the judgment rendered in the Superior Court, which must, therefore, be affirmed.

Per Curiam, Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel, J,

The plaintiffs are citizens of New York, and the defendant is a citizen of Texas. In the case of Broghill v. Wellborn, 4 Dev. 511, this court said, that a non-resident creditor cannot, under our attachment laws, attach the property of his debtor in this State, when the latter has not abscond ed nor removed to avoid the ordinary process of the law. It is not necessary here to repeat the reasons of the decision in that case. The case is in point and supports the judgment rendered in the Superior Court, which must, therefore, be affirmed.

Per Curiam, Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 N.C. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-buckley-nc-1845.