Taylor v. Bolmer

2 Denio 193
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1846
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Denio 193 (Taylor v. Bolmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Bolmer, 2 Denio 193 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Opinion

By the Court, Bronson, Ch. J.

The rule is, that when an assignee, or person beneficially interested in the demand, brings or carries on a suit in the name of another, he must pay the defendant’s costs if the suit fail. Here the assignees neither brought the suit, nor have they been instrumental in carrying it on. They have done no act whatever by way of prosecuting the claim. The defendant relies on a dictum of mine in Miller v. Franklin, (20 Wend. 630,) to the effect that it is enough that an assignee pendente lite knows of the suit, and allows it to proceed for his benefit. That was going too far. None of the cases charge the assignee unless he has employed the attorney, contributed money, or in some other way been instrumental in carrying on the litigation

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCarthey v. Wright
10 N.Y.S. 824 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Langley v. . Warner
3 N.Y. 327 (New York Court of Appeals, 1850)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Denio 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-bolmer-nysupct-1846.