Taylor v. Boardman

Michigan Supreme Court

Taylor v. Boardman

23 Mich. 317, 1871 Mich. LEXIS 99

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 12, 1871

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 Mich. 317 (Taylor v. Boardman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Boardman, 23 Mich. 317, 1871 Mich. LEXIS 99 (Mich. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Guayes, J.

The decree below ought to be affirmed. All the points essential to the complainant’s case appear to be made out, and it would be useless to recite them or repeat the record.

There is no force in the objection that the levy was made by one sheriff, and the sale by another. The proceeding appears to be regular under § Comp. L.

We think the evidence is nearly, if not quite, unanswerable, that the title set up by the Boardmans in opposition to that of complainant was, and is, fraudulent against the latter; and we discover nothing in the elaborate brief of defendants’ counsel, which breaks its force or averts its operation.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI