Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Taylor v. Board of Trustees of Glenlock Public School

Taylor v. Board of Trustees of Glenlock Public School

194 S.E. 169, 185 Ga. 61, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 673
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 27, 1937
DocketNo. 11913
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 194 S.E. 169 (Taylor v. Board of Trustees of Glenlock Public School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Board of Trustees of Glenlock Public School, 194 S.E. 169, 185 Ga. 61, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 673 (Ga. 1937).

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

1. No matter what the oral agreement was as to where the dividing line between the two properties was to be, it was merged into the subsequent deeds, became functus officio when the deeds were executed, and the rights of the parties are based alone upon the descriptions contained in the deeds. Compare Loftis v. Clay, 164 Ga. 845, 848 (139 S. E. 668); Keiley v. Citizens Savings Bank & Trust Co., 173 Ga. 11, 16 (159 S. E. 527); Kennedy v. Kennedy, 183 Ga. 432, 440 (188 S. E. 722, 109 A. L. R. 1143).

2. The rule that a parol agreement between owners of coterminous properties that a certain line is the true dividing line is valid and binding if the agreement is accompanied by possession to the agreed line, or is otherwise duly executed, and if the boundary line between the two tracts is indefinite, unascertained, or disputed, has no application to a state of facts in which at the time of the parol agreement there was no disputed line to be agreed upon. Miller v. McGlaun, 63 Ga. 435. The instant case does not deal with an oral agreement between parties who already own adjoining tracts, and who are in disagreement as to the dividing line between them. The parol agreement here involved can not be binding, because it was not njade to settle any dispute with respect to the true line.

[62]*62No. 11913. November 27, 1937.

3. The only basis for the ruling that such an agreement is not within the statute of frauds is that in instances where it is applicable it does not operate as a conveyance of land, but merely as an agreement with respect to what has already been conveyed. Farr v. Woolfolk, 118 Ga. 277 (45 S. E. 230). In the instant case it was not an agreement with respect to land that had already been conveyed, for the deeds were made subsequently to the alleged agreement.

4. The charge of the trial judge was not in all respects in harmony with the foregoing views, and grounds two and four of the amendment to the motion require the grant of a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Wyatt & Morgan, for plaintiff in error. J. J. Reese and J. L. Smith, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jordan v. Flynt
240 S.E.2d 858 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Akins v. Tucker
207 S.E.2d 625 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Jordan v. Ridgdill
169 S.E.2d 675 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Holland v. Shackelford
137 S.E.2d 298 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Kollen v. High Point Forest, Inc.
123 S.E.2d 10 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Thompson v. Arrington
72 S.E.2d 293 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Callaway v. Armour
65 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Melton v. Helms
62 S.E.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Hicks v. Smith
54 S.E.2d 407 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Johnson v. Young
53 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Toms v. Knighton
36 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Albany Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Henderson
36 S.E.2d 330 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Smith v. Lanier
34 S.E.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Kytle v. Collins
19 S.E.2d 754 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Swinson v. Jones
18 S.E.2d 646 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
McNeal v. Carter
12 S.E.2d 332 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Ingram v. Smith
7 S.E.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 S.E. 169, 185 Ga. 61, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-board-of-trustees-of-glenlock-public-school-ga-1937.