Taylor v. Blake

10 A. 698, 64 N.H. 392
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1887·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*393 Blodgett, J.

The title of the plaintiffs, both by deed and by prescription, to the water diverted from them by the defendant, is quite too plain for discussion.

Exceptions overruled.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Blake, 10 A. 698, 64 N.H. 392 (N.H. 1887).

10 A. 698 (Taylor v. Blake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fowler v. Kent
52 A. 554 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902)