Taylor v. Betts Naval Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Taylor v. Betts Naval Stores Co.

91 So. 126, 83 Fla. 242

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 14, 1922·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the orders aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there [243]*243is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the orders aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there [243]*243is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.

Taylor v. Betts Naval Stores Co., 91 So. 126, 83 Fla. 242 (Fla. 1922).

Pincite

91 So. 126 (Taylor v. Betts Naval Stores Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.