Taylor v. Barton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Taylor v. Barton

556 So. 2d 415, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2647, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6466, 1989 WL 139131

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 15, 1989

DocketNo. 89-416

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 556 So. 2d 415 (Taylor v. Barton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Barton, 556 So. 2d 415, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2647, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6466, 1989 WL 139131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a Florida State Prison inmate, appeals the summary denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In the petition appellant alleges that prison authorities placed him in administrative confinement without a hearing before a senior correctional officer so that he could present his views. Appellant further alleged he has exhausted his administrative remedies. If these allegations are true, the Department of Corrections would appear to have violated its rules, and so summary denial of the petition was inappropriate. Rahming v. Bigham, 539 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a Florida State Prison inmate, appeals the summary denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In the petition appellant alleges that prison authorities placed him in administrative confinement without a hearing before a senior correctional officer so that he could present his views. Appellant further alleged he has exhausted his administrative remedies. If these allegations are true, the Department of Corrections would appear to have violated its rules, and so summary denial of the petition was inappropriate. Rahming v. Bigham, 539 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 So. 2d 415, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2647, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6466, 1989 WL 139131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-barton-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack