Taylor v. Barnhart

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 2008
Docket19-4682
StatusUnpublished

This text of Taylor v. Barnhart (Taylor v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Barnhart, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1817

WAYNE TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Dennis L. Howell, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00282-DLH)

Submitted: April 4, 2008 Decided: April 16, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

V. Lamar Gudger, III, GUDGER & GUDGER, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Sidney P. Alexander, Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Triba, Chief Regional Counsel, Dino Trubiano, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wayne Taylor appeals the magistrate judge’s* order

denying his motion for summary judgment and granting the

Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment on his claim for

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income

under the Social Security Act. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the magistrate judge. See Taylor v. Barnhart, No. 1:06-

cv-00282-DLH (W.D.N.C. June 27, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Taylor v. Barnhart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-barnhart-ca4-2008.