Taylor v. Alabama Power Co.

District Court, S.D. Alabama·Decided March 20, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-00116·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL J. TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-00116-KD-N ) ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, et al, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER This action is before the Court on the motion to dismiss filed by pro se Plaintiff Michael J. Taylor (doc. 22). Review of the motion indicates that Taylor seeks to dismiss IBEW Local #345 from this action.1 IBEW Local #345 has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Thus, the Court construes the motion as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rosell v. VMSB, LLC, 67 F. 4th 1141, 1144 (11th Cir. 2023) (a plaintiff may dismiss all claims against a particular defendant under Rule 41(a), even when such a dismissal is less than the entire action). Accordingly, IBEW Local #345 is DISMISSED from this action. DONE and ORDERED this the 20th day of March 2024.

s / Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 Review of the Amended Complaint (doc. 21) indicates that while IBEW Local # 345 is named as a defendant in paragraph 3, it is not named as defendant in the style of the case and no counts are brought against it. Thus, Taylor appears to have tried to amend his complaint to eliminate IBEW Local #345 as a defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Alabama Power Co., (S.D. Ala. 2024).

Taylor v. Alabama Power Co. (Taylor v. Alabama Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Israel Rosell v. VMSB, LLC
67 F.4th 1141 (Eleventh Circuit, 2023)