Taylor & Twiss v. Pettibone
16 Johns. 66
This text of 16 Johns. 66 (Taylor & Twiss v. Pettibone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Taylor & Twiss v. Pettibone, 16 Johns. 66 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).
Opinion
The cases of Dando v. Doll and Tremper, (2 Johns, Rep, 87.) and the Bank of Columbia v. Newcomb and others, (6 Johns. Rep. 98.) decide this point. We there consider the judgment against the party not brought into court, as prima facie evidence of a debt, reserving to him the right to enter again into the merits, and Show that he ought not to have been charged. 1 '
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCall v. Asbury
9 S.E.2d 765 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Swift, Hurlburt & Co. v. Stark
2 Or. 97 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1864)
Oakley v. Aspinwall
4 N.Y. 514 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)
D'Arcy v. Ketchum
52 U.S. 165 (Supreme Court, 1851)
Mervin & Goldsmith v. Kumbel
23 Wend. 293 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)
Executors of Leake v. Lawrence
1 Ant. N.P. Cas. 331 (Superior Court of New York, 1836)
Townsend v. Carman
6 Cow. 695 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 Johns. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-twiss-v-pettibone-nysupct-1819.