TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard

357 A.2d 765, 70 N.J. 93
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 13, 1976·Published

Opinion

70 N.J. 93 (1976)
357 A.2d 765

FRANK H. TAYLOR AND SON, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SEYMOUR D. SHEPARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 27, 1976.
Decided May 13, 1976.

Mr. Theodore W. Geiser argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McElroy, Connell, Foley and Geiser, attorneys).

Mr. Floyd F. Lombardi argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. DeSevo, Cerutti and Lombardi, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

*94 For affirmance — Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judges CONFORD and CARTON — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard, 357 A.2d 765, 70 N.J. 93 (N.J. 1976).

357 A.2d 765 (TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frank H. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Shepard
357 A.2d 765 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)