TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard

357 A.2d 765, 70 N.J. 93
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 13, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 357 A.2d 765 (TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard, 357 A.2d 765, 70 N.J. 93 (N.J. 1976).

Opinion

70 N.J. 93 (1976)
357 A.2d 765

FRANK H. TAYLOR AND SON, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SEYMOUR D. SHEPARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 27, 1976.
Decided May 13, 1976.

Mr. Theodore W. Geiser argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McElroy, Connell, Foley and Geiser, attorneys).

Mr. Floyd F. Lombardi argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. DeSevo, Cerutti and Lombardi, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

*94 For affirmance — Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judges CONFORD and CARTON — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank H. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Shepard
357 A.2d 765 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 A.2d 765, 70 N.J. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-son-inc-v-shepard-nj-1976.