TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard
This text of 357 A.2d 765 (TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FRANK H. TAYLOR AND SON, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SEYMOUR D. SHEPARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Theodore W. Geiser argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McElroy, Connell, Foley and Geiser, attorneys).
Mr. Floyd F. Lombardi argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. DeSevo, Cerutti and Lombardi, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.
*94 For affirmance Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judges CONFORD and CARTON 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
357 A.2d 765, 70 N.J. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-son-inc-v-shepard-nj-1976.