Taylor Rae Rosenbusch v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 5, 2014
Docket04-14-00051-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Taylor Rae Rosenbusch v. State (Taylor Rae Rosenbusch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor Rae Rosenbusch v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00051-CR

Taylor Rae ROSENBUSCH, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011CR11074 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2014

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On October 18, 2013, Appellant Taylor Rae Rosenbusch was sentenced to twelve years’

confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division in trial court

cause number 2011CR11074. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due not later than November 18,

2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due not later than December

3, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. The clerk’s record shows Appellant’s

notice of appeal was filed on January 14, 2014; it does not show a motion for new trial or a motion 04-14-00051-CR

for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. In Appellant’s

motion to abate the appeal numbered 04-14-00050-CR, an appeal of trial court cause number

2011CR11075, Appellant acknowledges that she did not timely file a notice of appeal in this appeal

(i.e., 04-14-00051-CR).

Absent a timely-filed, written notice of appeal of a criminal conviction, this court lacks

jurisdiction over the appeal. Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522 (“A timely notice of appeal is necessary to

invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction.”); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App.

1988).

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shute v. State
744 S.W.2d 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Taylor Rae Rosenbusch v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-rae-rosenbusch-v-state-texapp-2014.