Taylor, II v. Commissioner of Social Security

S.D. Illinois

Taylor, II v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedJanuary 23, 2023

Docket3:22-cv-00650

StatusUnknown

This text of Taylor, II v. Commissioner of Social Security (Taylor, II v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor, II v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ill. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS RONALD W. TAYLOR II, ) Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 22-CV-650-SMY KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: Before the Court is the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 21), seeking to have this case remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon a sentence four remand, judgment should be entered in favor of the plaintiff. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302-303 (1993). Here, the parties agree that on remand, the Administrative Law Judge should re-evaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity, take further action to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision (Doc. 21). For good cause shown, the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 21) is GRANTED. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's application for social security disability benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and reconsideration of the evidence, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. . i DATED: January 23, 2023 Jer STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS RONALD W. TAYLOR II, ) Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 22-CV-650-SMY KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: Before the Court is the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 21), seeking to have this case remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon a sentence four remand, judgment should be entered in favor of the plaintiff. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302-303 (1993). Here, the parties agree that on remand, the Administrative Law Judge should re-evaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity, take further action to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision (Doc. 21). For good cause shown, the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 21) is GRANTED. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's application for social security disability benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and reconsideration of the evidence, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. . i DATED: January 23, 2023 Jer STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Taylor, II v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-ii-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ilsd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack