Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Taylor
129 S.E. 192, 190 N.C. 855, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 202
This text of 129 S.E. 192 (Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Taylor, 129 S.E. 192, 190 N.C. 855, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 202 (N.C. 1925).
Opinion
This case was tried carefully and correctly. No error appears to defendants’ prejudice. The doctrines laid down in Fry v. Utilities Co., 183 N. C., 288; Ferrell v. Cotton Mills, 157 N. C., 536; Graham v. Power Co., 189 N. C., 381, were in all respects followed by the learned and careful trial judge. There is
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Graham Ex Rel. Graham v. Sandhill Power Co.
127 S.E. 429 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Ferrell v. Dixie Cotton Mills
157 N.C. 528 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 192, 190 N.C. 855, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-ex-rel-taylor-v-taylor-nc-1925.