Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Taylor
129 S.E. 192, 190 N.C. 855, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 202
Opinion
This case was tried carefully and correctly. No error appears to defendants’ prejudice. The doctrines laid down in Fry v. Utilities Co., 183 N. C., 288; Ferrell v. Cotton Mills, 157 N. C., 536; Graham v. Power Co., 189 N. C., 381, were in all respects followed by the learned and careful trial judge. There is
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Taylor, 129 S.E. 192, 190 N.C. 855, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 202 (N.C. 1925).
129 S.E. 192 (Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Graham Ex Rel. Graham v. Sandhill Power Co.
127 S.E. 429 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Ferrell v. Dixie Cotton Mills
157 N.C. 528 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)