Taylor-Cotten v. District of Columbia Government
This text of Taylor-Cotten v. District of Columbia Government (Taylor-Cotten v. District of Columbia Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) JOANNE TAYLOR-COTTEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 16-cv-2036 (KBJ) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.., ) ) Defendants. ) )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 27, 2017, the defendants in this matter filed a motion to dismiss
plaintiff’s amended complaint. (See Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 19.) The Local Civil
Rules of this Court provide that “[w]ithin 14 days of the date of service or at such other
time as the court may direct, an opposing party shall serve and file a memorandum of
points and authorities in opposition to the motion [or] the Court may treat the motion as
conceded.” LCvR 7(b). To date, plaintiff’s counsel has neither filed an opposition to
the motion nor requested more time to do so. Therefore, the Court will GRANT the
defendants’ motion as conceded and will DISMISS this action without prejudice.
A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: May 9, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taylor-Cotten v. District of Columbia Government, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-cotten-v-district-of-columbia-government-dcd-2018.