Taylor-Cotten v. District of Columbia Government

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided May 9, 2018·No. Civil Action No. 2016-2036·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

JOANNE TAYLOR-COTTEN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 16-cv-2036 (KBJ)

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.., )

)

Defendants. )

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 27, 2017, the defendants in this matter filed a motion to dismiss

plaintiff’s amended complaint. (See Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 19.) The Local Civil

Rules of this Court provide that “[w]ithin 14 days of the date of service or at such other

time as the court may direct, an opposing party shall serve and file a memorandum of

points and authorities in opposition to the motion [or] the Court may treat the motion as

conceded.” LCvR 7(b). To date, plaintiff’s counsel has neither filed an opposition to

the motion nor requested more time to do so. Therefore, the Court will GRANT the

defendants’ motion as conceded and will DISMISS this action without prejudice.

A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: May 9, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor-Cotten v. District of Columbia Government, (D.D.C. 2018).

Taylor-Cotten v. District of Columbia Government (Taylor-Cotten v. District of Columbia Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.