Tayloe v. Varden
23 F. Cas. 727, 2 D.C. 37, 2 Cranch 37
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1811
StatusPublished
This text of 23 F. Cas. 727 (Tayloe v. Varden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tayloe v. Varden, 23 F. Cas. 727, 2 D.C. 37, 2 Cranch 37 (circtddc 1811).
Opinion
was clearly of opinion that, as Lee was out of possession when he made the deed of bargain and sale to Tayloe, the latter had not the possession, either in fact, or by construction of law; and therefore could not maintain an action of trespass.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 F. Cas. 727, 2 D.C. 37, 2 Cranch 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tayloe-v-varden-circtddc-1811.