Taxpayers For Vincent v. Members Of The City Council Of The City Of Los Angeles
This text of 738 F.2d 353 (Taxpayers For Vincent v. Members Of The City Council Of The City Of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TAXPAYERS FOR VINCENT, an unincorporated political
association, and Candidates' Outdoor Graphics
Service (COGS) a California corporation,
Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
MEMBERS OF the CITY COUNCIL OF the CITY OF LOS ANGELES; and
Edward D. Longley as Director of the Bureau of
Street Maintenance for the City of Los
Angeles, Defendants/Appellees.
No. 80-5686.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 20, 1984.
Wayne S. Canterbury, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellants.
Anthony S. Alperin, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants/appellees.
Before NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges and EAST,* District Judge.
On May 15, 1984, the Supreme Court reversed our judgment (682 F.2d 847) see Members of the City Council of the City of Los Angeles et al. v. Taxpayers for Vincent et al., --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2118, 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984), and remanded the case to us. We therefore remand to the district court for action consistent with the Supreme Court opinion.
The Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
738 F.2d 353, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taxpayers-for-vincent-v-members-of-the-city-council-of-the-city-of-los-ca9-1984.