Taxpayers For Vincent v. Members Of The City Council Of The City Of Los Angeles

738 F.2d 353, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20313
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taxpayers For Vincent v. Members Of The City Council Of The City Of Los Angeles. Read the opinion of the Court — 682 F.2d 847
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 20, 1984·No. 80-5686·Published

Opinion

738 F.2d 353

TAXPAYERS FOR VINCENT, an unincorporated political
association, and Candidates' Outdoor Graphics
Service (COGS) a California corporation,
Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
MEMBERS OF the CITY COUNCIL OF the CITY OF LOS ANGELES; and
Edward D. Longley as Director of the Bureau of
Street Maintenance for the City of Los
Angeles, Defendants/Appellees.

No. 80-5686.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 20, 1984.

Wayne S. Canterbury, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellants.

Anthony S. Alperin, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants/appellees.

Before NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges and EAST,* District Judge.

On May 15, 1984, the Supreme Court reversed our judgment (682 F.2d 847) see Members of the City Council of the City of Los Angeles et al. v. Taxpayers for Vincent et al., --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2118, 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984), and remanded the case to us. We therefore remand to the district court for action consistent with the Supreme Court opinion.

*

The Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taxpayers For Vincent v. Members Of The City Council Of The City Of Los Angeles, 738 F.2d 353, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20313 (9th Cir. 1984).

738 F.2d 353 (Taxpayers For Vincent v. Members Of The City Council Of The City Of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related