Tavolacci v. Smolev

114 A.D.2d 500, 494 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53202

This text of 114 A.D.2d 500 (Tavolacci v. Smolev) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tavolacci v. Smolev, 114 A.D.2d 500, 494 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dickinson, J.), entered May 1, 1984, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Whether or not defendant’s dog had vicious propensities is a question of fact for the jury (see, DiGrazia v Castronova, 48 AD2d 249). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DiGrazia v. Castronova
48 A.D.2d 249 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A.D.2d 500, 494 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tavolacci-v-smolev-nyappdiv-1985.