Tavetian v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.

215 A.D. 725

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, because of the exclusion of evidence at folios 90, 91, 93, 95 and 96, tending to establish plaintiff’s loss of earnings, «which were a proper element of damage. (Masterton v. Village of Mount Vernon, 58 N. Y. 391; Walsh v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 204 id. 58, 68.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jayeox, Young and Kapper, JJ,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tavetian v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co., 215 A.D. 725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

215 A.D. 725 (Tavetian v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Masterton v. . Village of Mount Vernon
58 N.Y. 391 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)