Tavernier v. Toner
This text of 159 A.D.2d 1011 (Tavernier v. Toner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: There are triable questions of fact precluding summary judgment for defendants on plaintiff’s claim for breach of an alleged agreement for joint owner[1012]*1012ship in the corporation. Similarly, questions of fact preclude summary judgment for defendants on their defenses based on the Statute of Limitations (see, Tavernier v Toner, 134 AD2d 972 [affirming without opinion denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment on timeliness grounds]), laches, abandonment, and lack or failure of consideration. Finally, defendants failed to establish their entitlement to summary judgment either dismissing the action as against the corporation, or dismissing the action against all defendants based on the Statute of Frauds (see, General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [1]; North Shore Bottling Co. v Schmidt & Sons, 22 NY2d 171, 175-176). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 A.D.2d 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tavernier-v-toner-nyappdiv-1990.