Tavernier v. Toner

159 A.D.2d 1011
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: There are triable questions of fact precluding summary judgment for defendants on plaintiff’s claim for breach of an alleged agreement for joint owner[1012]*1012ship in the corporation. Similarly, questions of fact preclude summary judgment for defendants on their defenses based on the Statute of Limitations (see, Tavernier v Toner, 134 AD2d 972 [affirming without opinion denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment on timeliness grounds]), laches, abandonment, and lack or failure of consideration. Finally, defendants failed to establish their entitlement to summary judgment either dismissing the action as against the corporation, or dismissing the action against all defendants based on the Statute of Frauds (see, General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [1]; North Shore Bottling Co. v Schmidt & Sons, 22 NY2d 171, 175-176). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tavernier v. Toner, 159 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

159 A.D.2d 1011 (Tavernier v. Toner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moss v. McKelvey
32 A.D.3d 1281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Board of Managers of Dickerson Pond Condominium I v. Jagwani
250 A.D.2d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)