Taveras v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
This text of 97 A.D.2d 792 (Taveras v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover on an insurance policy, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), dated August 13, 1982, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with costs. (See Bonus Warehouse v Great Atlantic Ins. Co., 93 AD2d 615.) We note that Lentini Bros. Moving & Stor. Co. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn. (53 NY2d 835, 837) is inapposite since the Court of Appeals specifically based its decision in that case upon “the insured’s unexcused and willful refusal to comply”. We find no such unexcused and willful refusal to comply in the instant case. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A.D.2d 792, 468 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taveras-v-new-york-property-insurance-underwriting-assn-nyappdiv-1983.