Tave Construction Co., Inc. v. Wiesenfeld

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Tave Construction Co., Inc. v. Wiesenfeld

217 A.2d 140, 90 N.J. Super. 244

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided February 17, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

90 N.J. Super. 244 (1966) 217 A.2d 140

TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BENJAMIN WIESENFELD AND BESS WIESENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRANKLYN B. SPIEZLE AND WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 1, 1966. Decided February 17, 1966.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys; Mr. Schreiber, of counsel; Mr. Gerald W. Conway, on the brief).

Mr. David L. Greene argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge Leonard's opinion in the Chancery Division, reported at 82 N.J. Super. 562.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

90 N.J. Super. 244 (1966) 217 A.2d 140

TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BENJAMIN WIESENFELD AND BESS WIESENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRANKLYN B. SPIEZLE AND WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 1, 1966. Decided February 17, 1966.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys; Mr. Schreiber, of counsel; Mr. Gerald W. Conway, on the brief).

Mr. David L. Greene argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge Leonard's opinion in the Chancery Division, reported at 82 N.J. Super. 562.

Tave Construction Co., Inc. v. Wiesenfeld, 217 A.2d 140, 90 N.J. Super. 244 (N.J. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

217 A.2d 140 (Tave Construction Co., Inc. v. Wiesenfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BENJAMIN WIESENFELD AND BESS WIESENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRANKLYN B. SPIEZLE AND WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Related

TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BENJAMIN WIESENFELD AND BESS WIESENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRANKLYN B. SPIEZLE AND WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.