Tavarez v. State
183 So. 3d 406, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13294, 2014 WL 4241733
This text of 183 So. 3d 406 (Tavarez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tavarez v. State, 183 So. 3d 406, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13294, 2014 WL 4241733 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Dunenas v. Moore, 762 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that when a negotiated plea agreement is not conditioned upon imposition of a sentence within a specified range under the sentencing guidelines, a claim of score-sheet error does not render the sentence illegal unless it exceeds the statutory maximum).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dunenas v. Moore
762 So. 2d 1007 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
183 So. 3d 406, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13294, 2014 WL 4241733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tavarez-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.