Tavarez v. Herrasme

2017 NY Slip Op 2148, 148 A.D.3d 576, 48 N.Y.S.3d 602
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 2017·No. 3488 305639/13·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Doris M. Gonzalez, J.), entered July 11, 2016, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a *577 motor vehicle accident, denied defendants’ motion to renew, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied defendants’ motion to renew plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, which was previously granted by Supreme Court and later affirmed by this Court (see 140 AD3d 453 [1st Dept 2016]). There is nothing in plaintiff’s deposition, which was taken after he was granted summary judgment, that constitutes new noncumulative facts that would warrant granting renewal (see Varela v Clark, 134 AD3d 925 [2d Dept 2015]; CPLR 2221 [e]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tavarez v. Herrasme, 2017 NY Slip Op 2148, 148 A.D.3d 576, 48 N.Y.S.3d 602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 2148 (Tavarez v. Herrasme) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Varela v. Clark
134 A.D.3d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Tavarez v. Herrasme
140 A.D.3d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)