Tavares v. Cargill, Incorporated

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 1, 2022·No. 1:18-cv-00792·Unknown

Opinion

MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 90058) Cody R. Kennedy, Esq. (SBN 296061) 29800 Agoura Road, Suite 210 Agoura Hills, CA 91301 Telephone: (818) 991-8080 Facsimile: (818) 991-8081 ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com ckennedy@marlinsaltzman.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff MARIBEL TAVARES, et al Jason E. Barsanti (SBN 235807) jbarsanti@cozen.com 501 W. Broadway, Suite 1610 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619-234-1700 Facsimile: 619-234-7831

Attorneys for Defendants CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP and CARGILL, INCORPORATED

-1- MARIBEL TAVARES, individually, and ) Case No.: 1:18-CV-00792-DAD- on behalf of other members of the general ) SKO public similarly situated and on behalf of ) other aggrieved employees pursuant to the ) STIPULATION AND ORDER California Private Attorneys General Act, ) REGARDING BELAIRE -WEST ) LANDSCAPE NOTICE Plaintiff, ) vs. (Doc. 55) ) CARGILL INCORPORATED, an ) Judge: Dale A. Drozd unknown business entity; CARGILL ) Magistrate: Sheila K. Oberto MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP, an unknown ) Complaint Filed: April 20, 2018 business entity; and DOES 1 through 100, ) Removed: June 8, 2018 inclusive, ) First Amended Defendants. ) Complaint Filed: July 12, 2018 -2- This stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff MARIBEL TAVARES and DEFENDANT CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP. (“CMSC” and collectively, the “Parties”) with reference to the following facts: On January 25, 2022, the Parties met and conferred and agreed to use the procedures described in Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. v. Superior Court, (2007) 149 Cal. App. 4th 554 to notify certain affected persons of this litigation and give them the opportunity to object to the disclosure to Plaintiff’s counsel of their contact information (the Belaire Notice). The Belaire Notice shall be sent to individuals which CMSC identified as non-exempt hourly employees employed at CMSC’s Fresno location, who worked anytime from April 20, 2014 until the date the Parties sign this Stipulation (the “Putative Class Members”). For the purpose of effectuating such notice, the Parties have further agreed upon a Belaire process through which CMSC will provide to Simpluris (the “Administrator”) the contact information (name, last known mailing address, telephone number, and email addresses (if available)) (the Contact Information) of the Putative Class Members. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, through their respective attorneys, as follows: 1. Notice to the Putative Class Members of the proposed disclosure of their Contact Information and their right to object to the disclosure shall be given by way of a notice and return postcard, the contents of which are shown on Exhibit A (Belaire Notice) hereto, to be administered by the Administrator. 2. Upon Plaintiff’s counsel contacting the Administrator as soon as this Stipulation is signed by the Parties, the Administrator will immediately prepare for mailing the agreed-upon Belaire Notice (Exhibit A) on the Administrator’s letterhead. 3. Within fifteen (15) calendar days of notice to CMSC of the Court’s entry of the Order approving this Stipulation, CMSC counsel shall email the -3- Administrator, in electronic format, a complete list of the Contact Information for the Putative Class Members as of the date the Parties sign this Stipulation, subject to Plaintiff’s counsel first providing the Administrator with a copy of this Stipulation and Order. 4. Within three (3) business days of the Administrator’s receipt of this Stipulation and Order, the Administrator will send the agreed-upon Belaire Notice (Exhibit A) to counsel for the Parties for approval. 5. Within seven (7) business days of the Administrator’s receipt of this Stipulation and Order and the Putative Class Members’ Contact Information, the Administrator shall run the Putative Class Members’ addresses through a National Change of Address search once per Putative Class Member, and then shall mail the Belaire Notice to the Putative Class Members by first-class U.S. Mail, with business reply mail postage on the preaddressed return postcard. 6. If the Administrator receives any returned envelopes with forwarding addresses, the Administrator will forward the Belaire Notice to the new address. The Administrator will not forward the Belaire Notice more than once per Putative Class Member. If the Administrator receives a returned envelope with no forwarding address, the Administrator will take no further action with respect to the notice contained in that envelope. 7. Putative Class Members shall have forty-five (45) calendar days from the date on the Belaire Notice to request that their Contact Information not be disclosed to Plaintiff’s counsel, as stated in the Belaire Notice. The decision by a Putative Class Member to object to the disclosure of his or her Contact Information may be communicated no later than the date on the Belaire Notice by signing and mailing the return postcard to the Administrator, postmarked no later than the date on the Belaire Notice, or by emailing as an attachment a clear and readable picture of the signed return postcard to the Administrator no later than the date on the -4- Belaire Notice. 8. CMSC and Defendant Cargill, Inc. shall not undertake to encourage any Putative Class Member to object to the disclosure of his or her Contact Information. 9. Five (5) business days after the deadline for Putative Class Members to object to the disclosure of their Contact Information by mailing the return postcard to request that their Contact Information not be disclosed, the Administrator shall email to counsel for Plaintiff and CMSC an Excel spreadsheet with each Putative Class Member’s updated Contact Information, except the Administrator shall first remove the Contact Information for those Putative Class Members, if any, who timely objected to the disclosure of their Contact Information and those Putative Class Members, if any, whose Belaire Notices were returned to the Administrator as undeliverable. The Administrator will advise counsel for the Parties of any questions regarding the timeliness or validity of a Putative Class Member’s objection, and counsel for the Parties will work together in good faith to resolve them. 10. Plaintiff’s counsel shall use the Contact Information provided to them by the Administrator only for purposes of this litigation, and shall not disseminate any of the Contact Information to any other person or entity. The Contact Information and all information derived therefrom shall be deemed Confidential pursuant to the Stipulation and Protective Order entered into by the Parties and shall be governed accordingly. Counsel for Plaintiff shall provide a copy of the Stipulation and Protective Order to the Administrator at the outset of the Administrator’s engagement, and the Administrator shall agree in writing to be bound thereby. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Paragraph or in the Stipulation and Protective Order, no Contact Information shall be disclosed to Plaintiff. -5- 11. Except for the administration fees and costs pertaining to the opt-outs by email, the Parties shall each pay 50 percent of the Administrator’s fees and costs for the Belaire Notice. CMSC will pay 100 percent of the additional fees and costs incurred by the administration and utilization of opt-outs by email. 12. Either Party may ask the Court to modify this Stipulation, on noticed motion or ex parte application, for good cause shown. 13. The Court’s Order on this Stipulation shall survive the termination of this action. Dated: January 31, 2021 COZEN O’CONNOR By: /s/ Jason Barsanti Jason Barsanti Attorneys for Defendants Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation Cargill, Incorporated Dated: January 31, 2021 MARLIN & SALTZMAN

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tavares v. Cargill, Incorporated, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Tavares v. Cargill, Incorporated (Tavares v. Cargill, Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. v. Superior Court
57 Cal. Rptr. 3d 197 (California Court of Appeal, 2007)