Tavani v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Tavani v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

97 A. 455, 252 Pa. 350, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 619

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 14, 1916

DocketAppeal, No. 272

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A. 455 (Tavani v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tavani v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 97 A. 455, 252 Pa. 350, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 619 (Pa. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The issue here was purely one of fact and for the jury, and having been properly submitted, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed. The only error assigned is that the charge of the court was inadequate, misleading and erroneous. We have examined the charge with care and do not agree with the appellant that the objection is well taken. The charge as a whole adequately and correctly presented the case to the jury, and the verdict is amply supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The issue here was purely one of fact and for the jury, and having been properly submitted, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed. The only error assigned is that the charge of the court was inadequate, misleading and erroneous. We have examined the charge with care and do not agree with the appellant that the objection is well taken. The charge as a whole adequately and correctly presented the case to the jury, and the verdict is amply supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A. 455, 252 Pa. 350, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tavani-v-philadelphia-rapid-transit-co-pa-1916.