Tautua v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles
This text of Tautua v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles (Tautua v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30291 30-OCT-2012 NO. SCWC-30291 11:50 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
ROPATI J. TAUTUA, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant,
vs.
BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent/Employer-Appellee, Self-Insured,
and
SEDGWICK CMS, Respondent/Third-Party Administrator-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CASE NO. AB 2005-503 (2-99-06569))
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nakasone, in place of Acoba, J., recused)
Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant Ropati J. Tautua’s
application for writ of certiorari, filed September 17, 2012, is
hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 30, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Ropati J. Tautua petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tautua v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tautua-v-bci-coca-cola-bottling-company-of-los-ang-haw-2012.