Tauszig v. Tauszig
This text of 226 A.D. 759 (Tauszig v. Tauszig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order staying and enjoining defendant from further prosecuting or proceeding to trial of his action for separation reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Under the circumstances here disclosed the order was not justified. (Thorne v. Thorne, 203 App. Div. 786, 787; Belasco Co. v. Klaw, 98 id. 74, 75; North Central Realty Co. v. Blackman, 145 id. 199; Grammer v. Greenbaum, 146 id. 3; Indestructible Metal P. Co., Inc., v. Summergrade, 197 id. 199.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tauszig-v-tauszig-nyappdiv-1929.