Tauszig v. Tauszig

226 A.D. 759
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order staying and enjoining defendant from further prosecuting or proceeding to trial of his action for separation reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Under the circumstances here disclosed the order was not justified. (Thorne v. Thorne, 203 App. Div. 786, 787; Belasco Co. v. Klaw, 98 id. 74, 75; North Central Realty Co. v. Blackman, 145 id. 199; Grammer v. Greenbaum, 146 id. 3; Indestructible Metal P. Co., Inc., v. Summergrade, 197 id. 199.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tauszig v. Tauszig, 226 A.D. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

226 A.D. 759 (Tauszig v. Tauszig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Beuren v. Van Beuren
249 A.D. 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Municipal Metallic Bed Manufacturing Corp. v. Dobbs
228 A.D. 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)