Tausik v. Tausik

173 N.E.2d 51, 9 N.Y.2d 664
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 19, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 173 N.E.2d 51 (Tausik v. Tausik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tausik v. Tausik, 173 N.E.2d 51, 9 N.Y.2d 664 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Motion to strike certain matter from the brief of respondent on the appeal herein granted upon the ground that the separation action was not considered below and reference to it is unnecessary to the result reached.

Concur': Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Macias v. Macias
2025 NY Slip Op 51627(U) (NYC Civil Court, Queens, 2025)
Aloni v. Oliver
70 Misc. 3d 137(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Heckman v. Heckman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Pugliese v. Pugliese
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Drost v. Hookey
25 Misc. 3d 210 (New York District Court, 2009)
Padilla v. Padilla
164 Misc. 2d 740 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1995)
Golfinopoulos v. Golfinopoulos
171 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Minors v. Tyler
137 Misc. 2d 505 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 N.E.2d 51, 9 N.Y.2d 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tausik-v-tausik-ny-1961.