Taurus Turnquest v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Taurus Turnquest v. State of Florida

166 So. 3d 893, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8498, 2015 WL 3486618

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 2015

Docket4D11-2286

StatusPublished

This text of 166 So. 3d 893 (Taurus Turnquest v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taurus Turnquest v. State of Florida, 166 So. 3d 893, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8498, 2015 WL 3486618 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his conviction of dealing in stolen property and sentence as a habitual felony offender to thirty years in prison. Over appellant’s objection, the trial court declared a mistrial on the charge of first-degree murder. Appellant argues that there was no manifest necessity for the trial court to declare a mistrial and therefore any retrial in the future on this charge would be barred by double jeopardy. We find this issue is prematurely raised and therefore we do not reach the merits of appellant’s argument. We find the other remaining six issues to be without merit and affirm.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his conviction of dealing in stolen property and sentence as a habitual felony offender to thirty years in prison. Over appellant’s objection, the trial court declared a mistrial on the charge of first-degree murder. Appellant argues that there was no manifest necessity for the trial court to declare a mistrial and therefore any retrial in the future on this charge would be barred by double jeopardy. We find this issue is prematurely raised and therefore we do not reach the merits of appellant’s argument. We find the other remaining six issues to be without merit and affirm.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 So. 3d 893, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8498, 2015 WL 3486618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taurus-turnquest-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.