Taunton v. Tilton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Taunton v. Tilton

673 So. 2d 149, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4750, 1996 WL 239285

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 1996

DocketNo. 95-1528

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 149 (Taunton v. Tilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taunton v. Tilton, 673 So. 2d 149, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4750, 1996 WL 239285 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

Following a hearing on a motion for clarification of visitation rights, the court modified the visitation schedule to substantially increase the father’s summer and Christmas visitation. While we take no position on the merits of the court’s action, we reverse because a request for modification was neither made nor noticed. See Bates v. Wishart, 545 So.2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA1989).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, Judge.

Following a hearing on a motion for clarification of visitation rights, the court modified the visitation schedule to substantially increase the father’s summer and Christmas visitation. While we take no position on the merits of the court’s action, we reverse because a request for modification was neither made nor noticed. See Bates v. Wishart, 545 So.2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA1989).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 So. 2d 149, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4750, 1996 WL 239285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taunton-v-tilton-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack