Taunton v. Tilton

673 So. 2d 149, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4750, 1996 WL 239285
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1996·No. No. 95-1528·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

Following a hearing on a motion for clarification of visitation rights, the court modified the visitation schedule to substantially increase the father’s summer and Christmas visitation. While we take no position on the merits of the court’s action, we reverse because a request for modification was neither made nor noticed. See Bates v. Wishart, 545 So.2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA1989).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taunton v. Tilton, 673 So. 2d 149, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4750, 1996 WL 239285 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

673 So. 2d 149 (Taunton v. Tilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monroe v. State
673 So. 2d 149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)