Taulbee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Taulbee v. State

1927 OK CR 333, 260 P. 783, 38 Okla. Crim. 306, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 334

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 4, 1927

DocketNo. A-5712.

StatusPublished

This text of 1927 OK CR 333 (Taulbee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taulbee v. State, 1927 OK CR 333, 260 P. 783, 38 Okla. Crim. 306, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 334 (Okla. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Lincoln county on a charge of fraudulent conveyance of real property, as defined toy section 2177, Comp. St. 1921, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $500.

The judgment was rendered on May 16, 1925. The appeal was lodged in this court on July 10, 1925. No briefs have been filed in support of the appeal, and no appearance for oral argument was made :at the time the ease was submitted.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court, and no *307 brief is filed, and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional or fundamental errors, and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment. We have examined the record, and no jurisdictional or fundamental error is apparent; the evidence sustains the judgment.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Lincoln county on a charge of fraudulent conveyance of real property, as defined toy section 2177, Comp. St. 1921, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $500.

The judgment was rendered on May 16, 1925. The appeal was lodged in this court on July 10, 1925. No briefs have been filed in support of the appeal, and no appearance for oral argument was made :at the time the ease was submitted.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court, and no *307 brief is filed, and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional or fundamental errors, and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment. We have examined the record, and no jurisdictional or fundamental error is apparent; the evidence sustains the judgment.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1927 OK CR 333, 260 P. 783, 38 Okla. Crim. 306, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taulbee-v-state-oklacrimapp-1927.