Tauk v. Tauk

145 S.W.3d 898, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1464, 2004 WL 2348317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tauk v. Tauk. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 954
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 2004·No. No. ED 83810·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nabil Tauk (Husband) appeals and Nas-rin Tauk (Wife) cross-appeals from a trial court judgment entered in a dissolution [899]*899action. Both Husband and Wife allege trial court error in the division of marital property and the amount of the monthly maintenance award to Wife. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, nor does it erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tauk v. Tauk, 145 S.W.3d 898, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1464, 2004 WL 2348317 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

145 S.W.3d 898 (Tauk v. Tauk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)