Home/New York Court of Appeals/Tauber v. Bankers Trust Co.

Tauber v. Bankers Trust Co.

735 N.E.2d 1286, 95 N.Y.2d 848, 713 N.Y.S.2d 520, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1798
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 6, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 735 N.E.2d 1286 (Tauber v. Bankers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tauber v. Bankers Trust Co., 735 N.E.2d 1286, 95 N.Y.2d 848, 713 N.Y.S.2d 520, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1798 (N.Y. 2000).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. The judgment affirmed by the Appellate Division purports to expressly sever a determined part of the second counterclaim from the pending portion of that counterclaim. The Court of Appeals will not give effect to a severance which splits a single cause of action (see, Burke v Crosson, 85 NY2d 10, 18, n 5; Sontag v Sontag, 66 NY2d 554, 555).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burke v. Crosson
647 N.E.2d 736 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Sontag v. Sontag
488 N.E.2d 1245 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
735 N.E.2d 1286, 95 N.Y.2d 848, 713 N.Y.S.2d 520, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tauber-v-bankers-trust-co-ny-2000.