Taubenslag v. Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc.
This text of 282 A.D. 856 (Taubenslag v. Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied. There was insufficient basis for the sweeping examination of defendant’s books. The application too was premature since the use of the books and records on the examination before trial that has been directed may suffice plaintiff’s needs. Moreover, granting of the motion at this time circumvents the prior order at Special Term directing that the examination before trial of plaintiff should precede the examination before trial of defendant. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 856, 124 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taubenslag-v-fabrikant-steel-products-inc-nyappdiv-1953.