Taub v. Credit Clearing House
This text of 242 A.D. 619 (Taub v. Credit Clearing House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order so far as appealed from modified by granting motion to vacate the notice of examination except as to items 1 and 2, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars [620]*620costs and disbursements to the appellant. (See Pring v. Thorp, 168 App. Div. 887; Mason v. N. Y. Review Pub. Co., 154 id. 651.) Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent on the authority of Shaw v. Samley Realty Co. (201 App. Div. 433); Welling v. Kugel (215 id. 770). The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 619, 271 N.Y.S. 1062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taub-v-credit-clearing-house-nyappdiv-1934.