Taub v. Credit Clearing House

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Taub v. Credit Clearing House

242 A.D. 619, 271 N.Y.S. 1062

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order so far as appealed from modified by granting motion to vacate the notice of examination except as to items 1 and 2, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars [620]*620costs and disbursements to the appellant. (See Pring v. Thorp, 168 App. Div. 887; Mason v. N. Y. Review Pub. Co., 154 id. 651.) Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent on the authority of Shaw v. Samley Realty Co. (201 App. Div. 433); Welling v. Kugel (215 id. 770). The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order so far as appealed from modified by granting motion to vacate the notice of examination except as to items 1 and 2, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars [620]*620costs and disbursements to the appellant. (See Pring v. Thorp, 168 App. Div. 887; Mason v. N. Y. Review Pub. Co., 154 id. 651.) Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent on the authority of Shaw v. Samley Realty Co. (201 App. Div. 433); Welling v. Kugel (215 id. 770). The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.

Taub v. Credit Clearing House, 242 A.D. 619, 271 N.Y.S. 1062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 619 (Taub v. Credit Clearing House) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related