Taub, Hummel & Schnall, Inc. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 304
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 17, 1955
DocketNo. 59441; protest 234701-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 304 (Taub, Hummel & Schnall, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taub, Hummel & Schnall, Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 304 (cusc 1955).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of alabaster glass beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. v. United States (17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020). The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States
17 Cust. Ct. 56 (U.S. Customs Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Cust. Ct. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taub-hummel-schnall-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1955.