Tatum v. State

741 So. 2d 1266, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13458, 1999 WL 817828
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1999·No. No. 99-2411·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Tatum appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He argues that he was a juvenile at the time he pled guilty to second degree murder and other crimes in 1993, and contends that his sentence is illegal because the sentencing court did not make findings regarding the necessity of adult sanctions. See § 39.059(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (1991). We reject that claim on authority of Summers v. State, 684 So.2d 729 (Fla.1996). We find no merit to appellant’s remaining points and reject them without discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tatum v. State, 741 So. 2d 1266, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13458, 1999 WL 817828 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

741 So. 2d 1266 (Tatum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tatum v. State
27 So. 3d 700 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)