Tatum v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway

58 S.E. 465, 128 Ga. 813, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 212
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 8, 1907·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Evans, J.

Where it does not appear either from an admission in the pleadings, or from the evidence submitted in behalf of the plaintiff on the trial of an action against a railroad company, for the recovery of damages alleged to have been the result of a personal injury, that, the tort was committed in the county where the suit was brought, or that the suit was brought in the' county where the principal office of the defendant was located, and that there was no agent of the railroad company in the county where the tort was committed, a judgment of nonsuit will not be disturbed. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. DuPont, 122 Ga. 251.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tatum v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway, 58 S.E. 465, 128 Ga. 813, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 212 (Ga. 1907).

58 S.E. 465 (Tatum v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia Power Co. v. Woodall
172 S.E. 76 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Bracewell v. Southern Railway Co.
68 S.E. 98 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)