Tatum v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
mtntteb ~tate~ QCourt of §ppeal~ for tbe jfeberal QCtrmtt
WILLIAM E. TATUM, JR.,
Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
2011-3233
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DA0752100569-I-1.
ON MOTION
ORDER
William E. Tatum, Jr. moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
TATUM v. MSPB 2
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
FOR THE COURT
DEC 12 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: William E. Tatum, Jr. Calvin Morrow, Esq.
u.s. COURTFILED
OF APPEALS FOR
s20 THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
DEC 12 ZOU
JANHOR8ALY
ClERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tatum v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Tatum v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.