Tatum v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tatum v. Merit Systems Protection Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 482 F. App'x 554
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 12, 2011·No. 2011-3233·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mtntteb ~tate~ QCourt of §ppeal~ for tbe jfeberal QCtrmtt

WILLIAM E. TATUM, JR., Petitioner,

v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

2011-3233

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DA0752100569-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

William E. Tatum, Jr. moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT: TATUM v. MSPB 2

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

FOR THE COURT

DEC 12 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: William E. Tatum, Jr. Calvin Morrow, Esq. u.s. COURTFILED OF APPEALS FOR s20 THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

DEC 12 ZOU JANHOR8ALY ClERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tatum v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Tatum v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Tatum v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.