Tatum v. James
This text of 99 A.D.2d 730 (Tatum v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on December 8,1982, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves arid files in the office of the clerk of the trial court, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict to $100,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Silverman, Fein, Milonas and Alexander, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 A.D.2d 730, 472 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatum-v-james-nyappdiv-1984.