Tatum v. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.
68 S.E. 307, 7 Ga. App. 795, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 524
Opinion
The ease rests solely upon issues of fact, which the jury settled in favor of the defendant in error; and not only some evidence, but apparently the preponderance of the evidence, supports the verdict. The judgment is affirmed, and the motion of the defendant in error to add damages for delay is granted. judgment affirmed, with damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tatum v. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co., 68 S.E. 307, 7 Ga. App. 795, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 524 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
68 S.E. 307 (Tatum v. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.