Tatum v. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.
68 S.E. 307, 7 Ga. App. 795, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 524
This text of 68 S.E. 307 (Tatum v. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tatum v. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co., 68 S.E. 307, 7 Ga. App. 795, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 524 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
Opinion
The ease rests solely upon issues of fact, which the jury settled in favor of the defendant in error; and not only some evidence, but apparently the preponderance of the evidence, supports the verdict. The judgment is affirmed, and the motion of the defendant in error to add damages for delay is granted. judgment affirmed, with damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 307, 7 Ga. App. 795, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tatum-v-hungerford-brass-copper-co-gactapp-1910.